Here is an article by David Evans in the Chronicle of Higher Education discussing the potential decline of the conference interview. I have included a portion of a response by the blog Tenured Radical, plus the link.
I should add that many universities used the phone interview in the last hiring cycle. A good friend of mine had about a half of a dozen phone interviews, some of which led to on-campus interviews (the holy grail for us grad students on the job market). My friend Rob ultimately got a tenure track job that came out of a phone interview. Rob did attend the AHA conference for interviews there, and I believe (my memory is hazy on this), that of his 5 interviews there, only one turned into an on-campus invitation.
I imagine in the lean market coming this autumn, most universities will conduct these phone interviews. In a future post, I will give my thoughts on Tenured Radical's reform ideas.
*************
My original academic discipline is English, so I was socialized to the hiring process fostered by the Modern Language Association — applications in October, conference interviews at the end of December, on-campus interviews in early-to-mid spring. For years (really, until I became a dean with responsibilities for disciplines with customs very different from my own) I was convinced that conference interviews were the way to go for hiring new faculty members.
I still think that conference interviews have a lot of advantages. Meeting candidates face-to-face is, I believe, considerably more effective than talking to them on the phone. Simply being able to read their body language, make eye contact, and interact directly provides a clarity that isn’t available by phone. The intensity of the conference-interview process, while exhausting, gives hiring committees the opportunity to make direct comparisons between candidates, refine their impressions, and get a sense of the candidates’ interest in the position.
***************
Response from Tenured Radical
In my opinion? It's on its way out. For what Zenith spent on searches this year, we could have hired a bunch of visitors, or two tenure-track faculty. Or we could have given the faculty we have a weenie little raise. Just a weenie one, but a raise all the same. Or not cut the library budget. Or....or.....
Budget cutting is no reason to end a tradition permanently if it is valuable, but I predict that budget cutting will jolt universities to some useful reforms. Replacing the conference interview with the phone interview is one of them. We had this conversation in my department recently, and I have had it with a Zenith administrator on two separate occasions.